<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New glass &#8211; Canon 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 USM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dazecoop.com/25-10-2006/new-glass-canon-28-105mm-f35-45-usm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dazecoop.com/25-10-2006/new-glass-canon-28-105mm-f35-45-usm</link>
	<description>Blog and website of David Cooper from Hampshire, UK. Dazecoop includes drifting photography, car modifying, drift cars, car talk and loads more :)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:16:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.dazecoop.com/25-10-2006/new-glass-canon-28-105mm-f35-45-usm/comment-page-1#comment-94857</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dazecoop.co.uk/25-10-2006/new-glass-canon-28-105mm-f35-45-usm#comment-94857</guid>
		<description>Following some positive comments by Geoffrey Crawley in the AP some time ago, I&#039;ve wanted one of these as I&#039;ve always felt that the Canon EF 24-105L is simply too large for a smallish body like my 5D.  I was lucky and found one advertised in mint condition with box and hood etc. just before Xmas 2008, so I ordered it, and haven&#039;t been disappointed.  

Whilst I will still choose prime lenses for critical work, I no longer feel that my day to day results are compromised.  On the way I turned down several Mk I samples where the finish was scuffed, and it does seem as though the new finish is a big improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following some positive comments by Geoffrey Crawley in the AP some time ago, I&#8217;ve wanted one of these as I&#8217;ve always felt that the Canon EF 24-105L is simply too large for a smallish body like my 5D.  I was lucky and found one advertised in mint condition with box and hood etc. just before Xmas 2008, so I ordered it, and haven&#8217;t been disappointed.  </p>
<p>Whilst I will still choose prime lenses for critical work, I no longer feel that my day to day results are compromised.  On the way I turned down several Mk I samples where the finish was scuffed, and it does seem as though the new finish is a big improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
